Trending
    Politics

    Elon Musk Asks the Wrong Question: The Media Have Always Been Biased and Guardians of Power

    hypeheadlinesBy Updated:No Comments8 Mins Read


    X figurehead and every day media provocateur Elon Musk was busy as ever on his X account this weekend, this time bearing on a favourite subject for him, the legacy media. Mr. Musk posed a surprisingly naive query for such an clever and seemingly well-read man.

    Like many on this nation, he puzzled how media had morphed into free speech haters once they appeared so pro-free speech up to now. Sadly, this concern factors to a extra vital concern: why was our society ever satisfied that legacy media cared in regards to the reality?

    Nonetheless, his posted ponder is value diving into, significantly given our ingrained and misplaced belief in conventional journalism. So, Elon, let’s discover out what occurred to legacy media.

    An previous query

    This weekend, Elon Musk posted on his X account:

    “How did many of the legacy media go from superheroes of free speech to supervillains of speech suppression?”

    What prompted this publish on Elon’s controversial social media web site may very well be any variety of issues, from his ongoing struggle with the Anti-Defamation League, varied lawsuits round how X manages speech on its web site, or perhaps simply the apparent bias and drive from legacy media to skew the nationwide narrative by amplifying some tales and burying others. This additionally isn’t a brand new query from Elon. 

    RELATED: Trump Flips The Script – Says He Doesn’t Think We Have ‘Much Of A Democracy Right Now’

    After releasing the well-known Twitter Recordsdata that confirmed rampant involvement and manipulation from the federal authorities and the blue hen, Mr. Musk asked:

    “Why is company journalism speeding to defend the state as an alternative of the folks?”

    This publish got here shortly after many left-wing information shops tried to downplay the Twitter Recordsdata and smear the journalists who reported them. Whereas Elon Musk might sound confused as to why legacy media wouldn’t be thrilled on the thought of reporting details, supporting free speech no matter whether or not they agree with it or not, or eradicating the veil on authorities corruption, he did anticipate some backlash from Huge Information as soon as he took over Twitter, now named X.

    Not-so-friendly competitors

    When he took over Twitter, Mr. Musk wasn’t shy about his final goal for the platform:

    “We wish it to be…essentially the place you go to study what’s happening and get the actual story.”

    He was alluding to his assist of what has been dubbed ‘citizen journalism.’ These entrepreneurial people report what is going on of their communities and broadcast their ideas on politics and points with out going by way of a conventional newsroom or editorial workplace – or darkish hallways in Langley.

    This wasn’t met with welcome arms by mainstream information, not to mention former associates of Mr. Musk. Kathy Yates, who labored with Mr. Musk on Zip2, one in every of his earlier ventures constructed to assist newspapers like The New York Instances transition into the digital area, warned that his embrace of free speech absolutism may very well be “dangerous.”

    RELATED: Elon Musk Slams Media ‘Cheering Squad’ After White House Sends Memo Demanding Outlets ‘Scrutinize Republicans’

    Ms. Yates warned:

    “It’s very harmful territory to permit anyone to say no matter they need, and never have a capability to have a layer of verification and alternate factors of view which can be fastidiously curated and chosen, in order that the reader actually will get a way more balanced standpoint versus only a bunch of voices shouting at them.”

    Harmful, she says, harmful to “permit” folks to say what they need? And who precisely will get to “curate” and “choose” information appropriate for public consumption? 

    The facility-hungry media elites who match comfortably within the pockets of presidency leaders, that’s who.

    The lengthy march

    Rising up, I bear in mind watching the identical information that principally everybody within the neighborhood watched, no matter political affiliation. I’m too younger for the falsely pedestalled Walter Cronkite, however I did develop up with Peter Jennings on “ABC World Information Tonight” and “60 Minutes.”

    I watched intently because the Gulf Battle unfolded on CNN, hanging on each phrase from Wolf Blitzer and Christiane Amanpour. Again then, I don’t recall my mother and father or the opposite adults they related to feeling as if they couldn’t belief what they noticed and heard on the information as something aside from truth.

    Quick ahead to the digital age, and now it’s related, besides everybody has their very own camps. You’re both a die-hard Fox Information loyalist or a frenetic fanatic MSNBC fangirl or fanboy. 

    RELATED: Elon Musk Trolls Bill Gates Over Past Ties To Jeffrey Epstein

    To imagine that any of the “journalists” or pundits in your most popular community aren’t, at a minimal, biased and on the unlucky different finish of the spectrum in another person’s pockets is naive and neglects historical past. Does nobody study in class in regards to the well-known tit-for-tat forwards and backwards between the Hearst and Pulitzer papers in the course of the late nineteenth century that birthed the time period ‘yellow journalism’?

    In case you are woefully unaware of what I write, do your self a favor and watch ‘Citizen Kane.’ The corruption of mainstream journalism has been an extended march by way of the ages; it’s simply extra noticeable now.

    Keep skeptical

    A Gallup Poll launched earlier this 12 months revealed that half of People imagine nationwide information organizations set out expressly to mislead the general public. Moreover, 52% of People disagree with the assertion that disseminators of nationwide information “care about one of the best pursuits of their readers, viewers and listeners.”

    This may increasingly appear dismal and miserable to some, nevertheless it’s refreshing and fills me with hope. For much too lengthy, People have believed that these reporting the information care in regards to the nation and the viewer’s struggles.

    That isn’t true. Legacy media and elite journalists imagine their job is to form public opinion by educating who they assume are the ignorant lots – that might be you and me, for the file.

    If you happen to learn and watch sufficient information, you’ll discover some widespread themes, however there are two which can be my private favourite:

    1. They’re by no means hurting for ‘unnamed’ authorities sources
    2. Academia is at all times keen to assist

    The federal authorities feeds the necessity for legacy media writers to really feel highly effective and related by offering – to make use of the phrases of Ms. Yates – fastidiously ‘curated’ info to, you guessed it, form public opinion. And dusty progressive liberal professors are all too desperate to lend their ‘knowledgeable’ opinion on any panel…for the appropriate value and guide plug.

    Keep the course, Elon

    I don’t assume Elon Musk does or says something with out an final objective. I additionally don’t assume he’s so ignorant to not understand how and even why legacy media provides two figs free of charge speech.

    I imagine and hope he posed the query to make you all give it some thought. However there’s hope, due to males like Elon.

    His platform and forward-thinking have allowed for open discourse on topics beforehand not discovered with people who find themselves usually shut out of the dialog. And if the mainstream is attacking you, you’re most likely onto one thing.

    A fast Google search of reports on Elon Musk will present headlines resembling these from main shops:

    Elon beforehand mentioned:

    “As Twitter pursues the objective of elevating citizen journalism, media elite will strive all the things to cease that from taking place.”

    You aren’t only a rocket scientist, Elon – you too can see the longer term. 

    Now’s the time to assist and share the sources you belief.
    The Political Insider ranks #3 on Feedspot’s “100 Greatest Political Blogs and Web sites.”





    Source link

    Share.

    Related Posts

    Add A Comment

    Leave A Reply