Just a little thought ought to have made him sceptical of that concept. Ukraine sank the Moskva in April 2022, simply two months into the battle. There was no nuclear response then, and there was no cause to imagine hitting smaller ships would trigger one in September 2022.
A yr later, Ukraine has crossed quite a few so-called purple traces, together with round Crimea, and it’s clear that if Putin actually is keen to order a nuclear strike towards a non-nuclear nation he’s attacking, the brink is significantly larger.
In equity to Musk, although, the US authorities has made an analogous name by not giving long-range ATACM surface-to-surface missiles to Ukraine, which has mentioned clearly it desires to make use of towards targets in Crimea. As Ukraine pushes south with its counteroffensive, the peninsula’s destiny more and more seems to be like a possible level of rigidity between Kyiv and its allies, and never simply Musk.
“COCKTAIL OF IGNORANCE AND BIG EGO”
From Ukraine’s perspective, retrieving Crimea is important, as a result of since annexing it in 2014, Putin as turned it into an enormous navy base pointed at Ukraine’s underbelly. As long as that continues to be, and there’s a fleet docked in Sevastopol, Russia may have the ability to dam essential ports and launch additional invasions at will, making Ukraine all however uninvestible.
For others extra scared of Russia’s nuclear potential, any try and retake Crimea represents a street to what Musk known as Ukraine’s “strategic defeat”.
Podolyak pulled no punches in his publish on X, describing Musk’s choice as the results of “a cocktail of ignorance and large ego’’ that price the lives of civilians later killed by Russia’s ship-launched missiles.